Woodmac d2.jpg

Trading houses’ risk appetite create more evolved worldwide LNG market

Sep 18, 2019
3 min read
Print this page

Giles Farrer, Research Director - Global LNG, Wood Mackenzie, writes about a shake-up in the sector


The rising influence of four commodity trading houses is shaking up the global LNG market.

Within just a few years, Trafigura, Vitol, Glencore and Gunvor – some of the most influential traders in the oil market – have played a part in transforming waterborne LNG trade. Changes in the market, such as growing flexible supply, short-term shipping availability and buyer fragmentation have facilitated their rise, allowing the players to move from exchanging the occasional spot cargo to controlling nearly 10 per cent of worldwide trade.

What’s their secret? High risk tolerance, ability to execute trades quickly and experience from other commodities.

These traders initially established their business in emerging markets where other companies, like NOCs or integrated majors, are shy to do business. Between 2015-2017, the trading firms built short positions in some of the industry’s key new markets: Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Argentina. The fact that they already had established commodity trading relationships in these markets meant they could get comfortable with the higher risk of sales


Appetite for LNG hedging instruments

The competition introduced by these traders is bringing perks for buyers too, such as lower selling prices. Their savviness and experience in deal structuring and financial hedging in other commodity markets means they have been able to buy and sell LNG at better prices and grow market share.

This has helped to improve liquidity and introduced new intricacy and complexity in the LNG market. Trader appetite for additional hedging instruments has benefited the exchanges, too. Trade for futures and swaps has recently quadrupled as the physical market evolves.


Vitol and Trafigura secure long-term U.S. LNG supply

With their market positions established, these companies are increasingly taking longer-term positions. Vitol and Trafigura committed to purchase large volumes of U.S. LNG in 2018. Vitol contracted for supply from Cheniere and Tellurian, while Trafigura linked up with Cheniere and Freeport. Both brought new complexity to the traditional U.S. Henry Hub-linked deals at a flat fee. Vitol’s deal with Driftwood is linked to JKM swaps. The agreements with Cheniere are believed to change under different price scenarios, while still tied to Henry Hub futures.

The changes give suppliers the chance to mitigate risk, while still gaining access to market upside. And as traders have recently won contracts from legacy suppliers like ADGAS, Sonatrach and Angola LNG, other sellers are gaining improved optionality in what is perceived to be a buyers’ market.


Could these agreements turn into more structured trading partnerships in the future? And how could the current landscape change?

These are subjects to be debated on September 19 as part of the LNG Trade Dynamics panel from 9:30-10:45am, during which Giles Farrer will speak on the subject “What innovations are commodity traders bringing to the LNG market?”